Siegel challenges some traditional tenets of Christianity
because they don’t scientifically hold up, like creationism versus evolution.
However, he does find examples that suggest a higher consciousness exists, most
notably in near-death experiences. Halfway through the book, Siegel concludes
that “successful reconciliation of science and religion must be based on
spiritual experience.”
The book's second half provides arguments against
“prominent proponents of new atheism” who rely on materialism. Here, Siegel
explains their major ideas and refutes them. But at the same time, he claims
these writers are in denial, ignorant, dehumanizing, narrow-minded, bigoted. As
readers, we don’t need Siegel’s judgments thrown at us—it actually weakens his own
voice.
Curiously, Siegel’s book ends abruptly with the “Idealogues”
section, giving the materialists the last word. Instead, he should have reiterated
dualism as a better way to explore religion and faith.
Fortunately, you don’t need a degree in science or
philosophy to follow Siegel’s reasoning, nor do you need to read the new
atheism books he writes about to follow his counter-argument. This is a weighty
book, containing nuggets that may resonate with skeptics and believers.
rating: ★★★★
A Skeptic's Faith: Why Scientific Materialism Cannot Be the Whole Truth
by Charles Siegel
Omo Press

No comments:
Post a Comment